Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Weather Wise

Michael Hanlon
Thursday 28 May 1998 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WARMER or cooler? It depends on your viewpoint. From the ground, measurements indicate that the Earth has been getting steadily warmer - by between 0.3C and 0.6C over the past 100 years. This warming has been largely attributed to the effects of man-made carbon dioxide and other chemicals.

Controversially though, from space, things look a little different. Satellite measurements of temperatures in the lower atmosphere show no warming trend, and reveal a slight global cooling in the past three decades. Analysis of the satellite data reveals that the greatest impact on global temperatures seen recently has been the works of wholly natural events such as the extreme El Nino episodes of 1983 and 1997, and the eruptions of volcanoes like El Chichon and Mt Pinatubo.

Greenhouse advocates may doubt the satellite data, insisting the computer models which predict a steep temperature rise resulting from the near doubling of CO2 seen this century must be correct. In other words, the satellites must be wrong. Trouble is, the data have been checked and rechecked, and no errors have been found.

One answer may lie in the behaviour of the lower atmosphere in the tropics. It was assumed that radiation from the surface is the main process by which heat may be lost from the Earth. But there has been a growing realisation that evaporation and convection processes are more important as ways of transferring heat into space. The effects of water vapour - the most important greenhouse gas - are poorly understood. Areas of the atmosphere with extremely low humidities can act as holes in the greenhouse, allowing energy to freely radiate into space. We need to take into account such effects.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in