Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

WE WON'T MEET AGAIN - LEESON'S FINAL FAX

Jeremy Warner,John Willcock
Thursday 02 March 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

BY JEREMY WARNER

and JOHN WILLCOCK

Nick Leeson, the 28-year-old trader responsible for breaking the City's oldest merchant bank, gave a detailed description of his ruinous transactions to Peter Baring, the bank's chairman, in a faxed letter of resignation sent shortly after his disappearance last Thursday.

All that is so far known of what is in the letter is that Mr Leeson signed off with an apology and the line that he doubted the two would ever meet again.

From sources in London and Singapore it is emerging that Mr Leeson only entered into his suicidal series of fraudulent trades after he had incurred substantial losses on behalf of Barings' London office.

Bank of England investigators have been questioning any Barings staff in London involved in the supervision of the Singapore office and with the Far Eastern settlement operation.

The investigators have been examining whether there has been any collusion with Mr Leeson from London. City sources said that some time ago Barings provided the Singapore office with a "significant sum", thought to be about £50m, to cover its daily margin calls. Leading American law firms are preparing to sue Barings over hundreds of millions of pounds invested in the failed bank's fund management side, which they claim should have been independently held. The threat of such litigation could complicate difficult talks being held by Ernst & Young, the administrators, to dispose of Barings in whole or in part.

Investigators in Singapore have established that as far back as a month ago, Barings' London treasury department began large-scale funding of margin calls as losses on Mr Leeson's positions began to mount.

It is not clear if Mr Leeson was at that stage dealing on behalf of the bank or its clients. He then dramatically in

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in