Water firm pressured on drought role
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WILL BENNETT
Yorkshire Water, which has been heavily criticised for its handling of the drought, promised to produce a detailed plan of action to deal with the water shortage last night.
The plan will be ready by next Monday, Sir Gordon Jones, chairman of Yorkshire Water, told John Gummer, Secretary of State for the Environment, in London yesterday.
Sir Gordon was invited to a meeting by Mr Gummer after parts of Yorkshire were identified as the areas hardest hit in a report on the drought from the National Rivers Authority last week.
A spokeswoman for the Department of the Environment said after the meeting: "They had a clear and direct discussion which went into some detail on what is being done . . . especially to avoid standpipes."
She said that Yorkshire Water had promised to provide a detailed zone- by-zone report on plans for the region by next Monday together with medium and long-term predictions for water supplies.
Earlier in the day Sir Gordon, who earns pounds 189,000 a year, admitted that Yorkshire Water had not spent enough money on reducing leaks but dismissed suggestions he had been called in for a "going over" by Mr Gummer. He said: "I do not see it like that. But I think we are now culpable in the light of history in that we did not spend enough money on leakage reduction as a means of securing supply."
He also said he felt the spotlight had fallen on Yorkshire, rather than any other company, because it had been the first firm to recognise the extent of the problems and take action.
He could not promise customers in parts of West and North Yorkshire they will not be faced with rationing or standpipes. "A lot now depends on the way people respond to appeals to use less water and on the weather," he said.
The DoE spokesman said ministers had no plans to meet the heads of North West or South West Water, companies which are also facing critical situations in some areas.
North West Water yesterday became the latest to apply for a ban on non- essential use of supplies saying recent rain had had no impact on reservoir levels. The ban would cover Greater Manchester, most of Lancashire and Cumbria.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments