Watchdog tells Monsanto to stop making GM safety claim
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MONSANTO, THE genetically modified food giant, has been ordered to stop claiming that it has been testing the safety of its GM crops for the past 20 years.
The Advertising Standards Authority has upheld complaints from environmental groups about a series of newspaper advertisements used by Monsanto to calm public fears over the safety of GM foods.
The adverts claimed that "rigorous tests have been undertaken throughout Monsanto's 20-year biotech history to ensure our food crops are as safe and nutritious as the standard alternatives".
The ASA took expert advice from scientists and discovered that before 1983 Monsanto's research was centred on developing GM techniques and did not include evaluation of their effects on humans and the environment.
The ASA dealt with complaints from the public and environmental groups such as the Soil Association and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds against 13 adverts. In all, the regulator upheld four complaints and dismissed the rest. Among those upheld were complaints about an advert by pro-hunt group Countryside Alliance. It was found to have used "misleading and inaccurate comments" in an advert that aimed to tell the truth about country sports. The judgment said that some of the statements made by the Countryside Alliance were "misleading", that it had misquoted from a previous ASA report and it said the Alliance should "take more care in future" with its adverts.
The complaints are part of a growing trend where the ASA finds itself adjudicating on politically sensitive claims between activist groups and commercial companies.
The regulator spent three years investigating claims made by Nestle in an advert in a student newspaper about its supplies of formula milk to the developing world. The ASA investigation came after complaints from the campaigning group Baby Milk Action and the adjudication allowed the group to claim victory over Nestle.
Individuals with concerns about the regulation of the cosmetic surgery industry have also used the ASA to attack companies they believe to be misleading the public and breaking the regulations about their surgeons' qualifications.
Complaints to the ASA by a few dedicated individuals have led the Government to consider tightening up the regulation of clinics offering cosmetic surgery.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments