Waste dumps linked to greater risk of birth defects
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WOMEN LIVING close to waste dumps face a third higher risk of giving birth to children with defects, The Lancet reports today.
A study that checked 21 landfill sites in five countries found there was a 33 per cent increase in birth defects such as spina bifida and holes in the heart when mothers lived within 3km (1.8 miles) of a site.
The researchers from London looked at 1,089 cases of children born with birth defects whose mothers had lived within 7km (4.2 miles) of a landfill site and matched them with 2,366 children without malformations whose mothers lived within a similar zone.
The risks fell the farther women lived from the sites.
"We have found increased risks of many types of congenital anomaly near the landfill sites," said the researchers. "There was a significantly overall increased risk of neural-tube defects, malformations of the cardiac septa (hole-in-the-heart), and malformations of the great arteries and veins in residents near the sites."
But it was not clear whether the increased risk of birth defects was caused by living near toxic waste or by some other factor. They recommended health monitoring for landfill sites and other pollution sources, to include registers of birth defects and assessment of exposure to chemicals.
"Our results show the need for further investigation of the potential environmental and health risks of landfill sites and for a more systematic environmental health surveillance system in Europe." the team added.
Professor Goran Pershagen, from the Institute of Environmental Medicine, Stockholm, stressed that no one knew how much exposure, if any, the women had had to chemicals from the landfill sites. "Overall the evidence is very limited, and the results clearly point to the need for further study." he said.
Friends of the Earth said there were 8,000 landfill sites in the UK of which 2,000 are active. Mike Childs, the senior waste campaigner at FoE said yesterday: "This research is extremely worrying. We havewarned for years that landfill sites are toxic timebombs. There are thousands of landfill sites and no one has a clue what toxic chemicals are dumped in many of them.
"The Government must urgently conduct detailed health studies around rubbish dumps in the UK."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments