VOTING SYSTEM HOLDS KEY TO ULSTER POLL OUTCOME
David McKittrick on how technicality shapes poll outcome
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Although the issue of the voting system to be used in a Northern Ireland election may seem to be a technicality, it is in fact of great importance to the local parties who would stand in such a contest.
For example, in most elections David Trimble's Ulster Unionist party comes out well ahead of the other parties. But in one particular type of contest, that used for European elections, Mr Trimble's party regularly comes in third place.
Mr Trimble's desire not to finish behind the Rev Ian Paisley's Democratic Unionists and John Hume's SDLP helps explain why he has been lobbying so hard against anything resembling European contests. His party considers it scored a major victory in having an election placed on the agenda, but that sense of triumph would be soured by a contest which relegated it to third place in the pecking order.
Northern Ireland is one of the most regularly polled entities in the world, having experienced 19 full-scale elections in the last 21 years. The statistics amassed over that period show clearly how different types of contest produce different results.
In the House of Commons, for example, the Ulster Unionists hold nine seats while Mr Paisley has three, notching up on average 14 per cent of the vote. His vote goes up, however, in elections to assemblies or to local councils.
This is because in these contests a system of proportional representation is used, with candidates standing in multi-member constituencies. The Ulster Unionist party takes the largest share of the vote in these, with Mr Paisley usually taking around 17 or 18 per cent.
This pattern changes dramatically, however, in European contests. The three Euro-MPs are also elected by proportional representation, but in these cases Northern Ireland is treated as one large constituency. This has the effect of turning the poll into a so-called "beauty contest" in which the leading personalities - Mr Paisley and Mr Hume - attract much larger votes than usual.
This effect is most clearly to be seen in a comparison of the 1993 council elections and the 1994 European election. The DUP performance leapt from 17 to 29 per cent, the SDLP went up from 22 to 29 per cent, while the Ulster Unionists dropped from 29 to 24 per cent. The European result is unlikely to be replicated in any new election, but nonetheless any contest based on a single constituency would be bad news for Mr Trimble.
Many variations of constituency and election type are possible, and the government says no decisions have yet been arrived at on the precise form. It is widely accepted that both council and European elections have democratic validity, but the fact that they produce such different outcomes explains why the present argument on form is seen as so important.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments