Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Vitamin makers admit price-fixing conspiracy

Cherry Norton Health Correspondent
Tuesday 07 September 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

SIX BIG vitamin manufacturers agreed to pay $1.1bn (pounds 688m) in a price-fixing lawsuit that could benefit British consumers.

The landmark settlement is intended to conclude an action brought in America against the companies, alleging that they took part in a nine- year conspiracy to fix wholesale prices.

It was claimed the conspiracy led to artificially high prices for hundreds of food and beverage manufacturers, including Coca-Cola, General Mills and Kraft Foods.

In two weeks the agreement will be presented to Judge Thomas Hogan, of the US District Court for the District of Columbia, to determine the fairness of the settlement, The Washington Post reported.

The six companies, which include Roche of Switzerland, BASF of Germany and Rhone-Poulenc of France, control 80 per cent of the market for the most popular vitamins, including A, C and E.

British consumer organisations said the settlement could reduce prices of some food and drinks. "All products that have vitamin supplements in them will have been affected," said Phil Evans, senior policy researcher at the Consumers' Association. "If companies are price-fixing in America, where the law is tougher, then the British Government and the European Commission should be looking at whether it is happening here.

"How much consumers will benefit will depend on how much competition there is for the particular product. If Coca- Cola see their costs cut by 1 or 2 per cent because of cheaper vitamins, then, because of the competitive market they are in, there is no reason why they would not pass it on to the consumer," he said.

The deal is the latest in a number of financial setbacks for the world's leading vitamin manufacturers. In May the US government fined Roche and BASF $500m and $225m respectively for conspiring to fix the price of vitamins. The companies had eventually admitted their guilt to the anti-trust division of the US Department of Justice.

Officials alleged that in meetings at hotels and homes around the world, the companies had colluded to divide up markets and set vitamin prices.

The companies refused to confirm the latest settlement. Roche Holding said that talks on settling civil lawsuits arising from a US vitamins price-fixing case were making good progress but it would not confirm a tentative accord had been struck.

"The settlement discussions are well advanced. We are hopeful of making a settlement," a company spokesman said. "I cannot confirm the timelines or the amounts mentioned."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in