Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.More than half-a-century ago, residents at two villages were promised that an airfield would be turned back to farmland at the end of the Second World War. But, 50 years on, they have abandoned such dreams to concentrate instead on the business of warding off bids to build hundreds of houses there.
Far from enhancing the villages, the disused land at Marsworth Camp could potentially destroy a rural style of life which has been cherished by locals since the days of the Domesday Book.
In her 12 years as clerk to Marsworth parish council, in Buckinghamshire, Sylvia Frost has encountered several land-hungry developers. Most recently, Skimmed Milk Suppliers Limited applied to build 100 residential dwellings on the property. The application was thrown out by the local district council (Aylesbury Vale) and has now gone to appeal, leaving villagers nervously awaiting the response by John Gummer, the Secretary of State for the Environment.
Local opinion is unanimous: the consequences of developing the airfield site, situated between the two Hertfordshire villages, Long Marston and Marsworth, would wipe out both communities at a stroke. The obvious problem would be the terrific increase in traffic on the narrow country lanes and canal bridges. What is now a peaceful amble over to the canal could become a hazardous venture.
Mrs Frost explained the traditional routine: "Marsworth has a very narrow hump-back canal bridge over which only one car can pass at a time. Villagers walk over it to get to the canal. There are all sorts of plans for traffic lights and hatchings on the side of the road for pedestrians but, I mean, this is a little rural community. It's totally unsafe."
There is also the toll that such an influx of residents would take on the fabric of the community. "Where would these people go to? Who would they gel with?" Mrs Frost asked.
"There's no one in the village who objects to newcomers, but if we have 100 houses we're going to have 200 people all at once. That's an awful lot of people to absorb into a community at one go. It will either be a separate settlement or it could set a precedent for everything to be joined together. We could become another Aylesbury or Tring or something. That would be a tragedy."
The situation is similar in Long Marston, where Rick Williams, chairman of planning for Tring rural council, is fighting the case for the village. "We don't feel there is the need for the housing. There are a lot of houses up for sale around our way. Whatever house you want you can have - at a price. But the other lot will cost you too."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments