Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

University inquiry into expenses was misjudged

Lucy Ward
Wednesday 21 May 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

An investigation into the expenses claimed by a jet-setting university vice-chancellor involved "errors of judgement", the Government's public spending watchdog said yesterday.

The National Audit Office found that Portsmouth University had not complied with good practice in its handling of allegations against Neil Merritt, who resigned as vice-chancellor in December, 1994. The university had incurred "significant costs" during its investigation launched 1993, including around pounds 140,000 for an independent inquiry. The NAO said there was no evidence that anyone involved in handling the investigation had acted improperly, but believed the university's audit committee had misjudged the seriousness of the vice-chancellor's actions because it did not involve the theft or the loss of university funds. It recommended that other universities learn lessons from Portsmouth's experience in setting procedures on handling misconduct for senior staff. It also called for the Department for Education and Employment to offer more guidance on the duties and responsibilities of governing bodies. Lucy Ward

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in