Universities overhaul admissions system
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Universities have agreed to a radical overhaul of the admissions system so that students apply after receiving A-level results, ending the stress and uncertainty of the present process. If practical problems can be overcome, students would send computerised applications which would be received within minutes. Admissions officials argue that it makes no sense to apply for a course a year before embarking on it and with little idea of A-Level results.
A working group set up by the Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals (CVCP) has agreed to design a system for consideration, which could be in place by 1998,and under which students would receive their results almost a week earlier. At present, universities receive notification several days before the schools Once the results arrived, they would add grades and choice of course to a computer document already bearing details and references. A form rejected by a first-choice university could be quickly redirected on-line to the next choice.
While few universities interview students routinely, preferring to invite them to open days, Oxford and Cambridge would continue to do so.
David Young of the CVCP said practical difficulties could still lead to its collapse. "We might find ruefully at the end of the day that it isn't possible, but I don't think there is anybody who is opposed to the idea in principle," he said.
Tony Higgins, chief executive of the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service, has argued in favour of reform for two years. "We have to see if we can devise a system that is robust, transparent and fair," he said.
John Dunford, vice president of the Secondary Heads Association, is on the working group. "Young people are no longer going to have to play a game of tactics for which they don't know the rules,"he said.
Leading article, page 16
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments