Whitehall's response to complaints attacked
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Whitehall was on the receiving end of yet more embarrassing criticism from a cross-party Commons committee yesterday.
The committee on the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration - the Ombudsman - accused civil servants of failing to respond properly to genuine grievances. 'In an age of (Citizen's) Charter documents and emphasis on the value of complaints, we consider that a culture of grudging and delayed redress is inappropriate,' the report said.
Departments, said the Tory-dominated committee, 'should seek out those affected by serious maladministration, not wait to be contacted.' They should be prepared to pay large sums of money, if necessary.
Three cases were singled out.
The Department of Social Security was attacked by William Reid, the Ombudsman, for serious delays in introducing the new disability living allowance.
The Welsh Office was criticised for failing to give local authorities sufficient notice of the date of changes to housing grant rates. the committee accused the Welsh Office of quibbling over the term 'maladministration'.
The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency improperly revoked the licences of 231 heavy goods vehicle drivers, and made no attempt to publicise the consequences or identify those affected. The committee said: 'We are astonished at such a lack of concern for the well-being of members of the public, some of whom had lost their livelihood through no fault of their own.'
In future, the committee said, 'we will look with particular disfavour on departments and agencies which repeat failures previously exposed'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments