Warren 'consented to TV programme'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FRANK WARREN, the boxing promoter, consented to a television programme being broadcast and then issued a libel writ against Terry Marsh, the former world light welterweight boxing champion, the High Court was told yesterday.
Mark Warby, for Mr Marsh, told the jury that two Thames TV executives had asked for Mr Warren's permission to broadcast the sports programme. 'He can't come before you in all common sense and justice to ask for damages for what he freely agreed to be broadcast,' he said.
Mr Warren, 40, of Tewinwater, Hertfordshire, is suing Mr Marsh for damages over comments he made on Thames Television's Midweek Sports Special in January 1989, which implied he had allowed Mr Marsh to sign a contract for a fight, knowing he was suffering from epilepsy. Mr Marsh, 34, of Basildon, Essex, denies libel.
Mr Warby described Mr Warren's legal action as a 'grudge match' and asked the jury to consider why Mr Marsh should lie. He was trying to obtain a licence and it would not have been in his interests to alienate Mr Warren.
Thomas Shields, for Mr Warren, told the jury that Mr Marsh was not a reliable witness. He said Mr Warren's reputation as a promoter had been damaged and asked the jury to award a 'sensible and decent sum.'
The jury is expected to consider its verdict today.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments