Virus plan to track pollution rejected
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.(First Edition)
PLANS to use viruses with unique genetic 'tattoos' to help track pollution in rivers have been rejected by the Government's safety advisors. The scientists involved have been told they must produce more information on the risks of their planned experiment before they can hope for clearance.
This is the first time the Advisory Committee on Release to the Environment (Acre) has thrown a risk assessment back at a proposer since it began checking the safety of trials on genetically altered organisms under new environmental protection laws of 1990.
The proposal for the experiment comes from the National Rivers Authority (NRA) and a team at Lancaster University who hope to test the genetically modified viruses next summer in waterways that run into Morecambe Bay from a site in Heysham, near Lancaster. If the test is successful, the NRA hopes to place viruses, each tagged in a slightly different way, into the drainage systems of industrial plants suspected of causing pollution. Identifying the virus that appeared downstream, complete with tag, would pinpoint the source of the pollution. This could help the Government to enforce its 'polluter pays' principle.
The head of the Lancaster team, John Smith, is convinced the experiment is safe, and potentially of huge benefit to the environment. The salt water of Morecambe Bay should stop the viruses growing, and after a few months they should die off, he said.
But Acre has questioned aspects of his risk analysis. It believes the virus could infect more species than he has assumed. It could, for example, colonise human or animal guts. The committee also wants to know more about monitoring arrangements.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments