Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Video firm challenges 'ban' by film censor

Helen Hague
Monday 17 October 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A VIDEO company has lodged an appeal against the British Board of Film Classification's refusal to classify one of its titles, writes Helen Hague.

Redemption films, which specialises in horror and sex films, said that Bare Behind Bars, a 1987 German film, had been rejected because it would contravene new statutory guidelines contained in the Criminal Justice Bill.

James Ferman, the BBFC director, rejected the film on the grounds that it would deprave and corrupt those who see it. But Redemption says he also applied a more stringent test set out in the Criminal Justice Bill, which is due to become law later this month. This states that the BBFC must have regard to 'any harm which may be caused to potential viewers - including under-age viewers - or, through their behaviour, to society by the manner in which the work deals with sex, violence, horror, drugs or criminal behaviour'.

Paul Chinnery, of Stephens Innocent, Redemption's solicitors, said the decision showed that 'as a result of the BBFC's new approach on video classification it will be much harder for many films to get a certificate.

This will have a profound effect on creative freedom in the film and video industry'.

Mr Ferman said that there was a long list of reasons why the film had been rejected, but acknowledged that the Criminal Justice Bill was a factor.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in