UK bosses' pay 'absurdly high' and slashing salaries would 'not hurt economy', warn top head-hunters
Top 10 recruitment firms admit some chief executives are 'mediocre' and could be replaced by 100 others
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Salaries for Britain's top business leaders are "absurdly high" and there would be no negative impact on the economy if their pay was slashed, a study has found
Head-hunters from the top 10 international recruitment firms claimed many people chosen for top jobs in recent years were "mediocre" and that each of them could be replaced by another 100 candidates - just as capable of doing the job.
A London School of Economics report analysing the FTSE 100 companies accounts found chief executives earned an average of £4.6m a year.
On average FTSE 100 CEO pay in 2014 was 183 times the full-time UK worker, up from 182 times in 2013 and 160 times in 2010.
The report featured interviews with the top 10 international recruitment firms involved in up to 90 per cent of chief executive appointments over recent years.
It said the market rules for executive jobs had set the salary bar so high that head-hunters agreed it would be "a poor strategy" to ask for less money to do the same job.
On the contrary, it said asking for a bigger pay seems to have "a positive effect in securing the appointment".
Max Steuer, reader emeritus at the LSE and author of the new research paper, Headhunter Methods for CEO Selection, wrote: “There was almost universal agreement among the search firms that levels of remuneration for CEOs in large UK non-financial firms was absurdly high,"
"All the interviews supported the notion of an arbitrary norm for pay, which almost all firms felt was grossly and inappropriately high … The general view of search firms is that a lower norm would not materially affect what happens.
One head-hunter told him: “I think that the wage drift over the past 10 years, or the salary drift, has been inexcusable, incomprehensible, and it is very serious for the social fabric of the country.”
Mr Steuer said it was unlikely British executives would leave the UK if they were paid less. He cited examples like in Denmark and other European countries, where chief executives are paid less than in the UK but appear to have no intention to leave.
"Contrary to people saying these chief executives are ‘unusually able’, we don’t find any evidence of that," he added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments