Tube strike: Six misconceptions about the Underground workers' action debunked
Members of four unions intend to strike from 6.30pm for 24-hours
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.As London gears up to weather another Tube strike, misconceptions about the strikers – and their industrial action – are gaining pace.
A spokesperson for Unite, one of the four unions taking part in the strike across London, explained why their members were striking and what the action really meant.
Tube workers are striking over money
They are not. Alex Flynn, spokesperson for Unite, claims they are striking over the “impact which the change will have on peoples’ working lives.” He continued that the proposed changes to the Tube system (the Night Tube) were done with "minimal consultation".
They are all wealthy anyway
Tube staff are “ordinary working people with families and mortgages”, Mr Flynn stressed. He added they were losing a day’s pay over the action and that it was seen as a “last resort” against the proposed changes.
They are not sorry about the disruption
“This is not something that they [Unite members] take lightly,” he said. He added that many members wished to “apologise for the inconvenience that industrial action will cause.”
They don’t support the night Tube
Not true. “Our members want to see Night Tube be a success, keep London on the move and people coming back from a night out,” he said.
They rejected the latest offer because they wanted to strike
Mr Flynn claims that while the unions have approached all the talks with openness and a desire to avert the strikes, London Underground (LU) have repeatedly failed to reassure workers over proposed changes.
“The latest offer failed to do was give cast iron guarantees for future shift patterns – instead there were vague promises,” he said.
It is all the unions’ fault
Mr Flynn claims that a LU “needs to shoulder the responsibility” as well. “LU knew that the timetable for the night tube yet they left it to the last minute to address staff issues… it is not something that has come out of the blue for LU.
He added: “Time is ticking but we are ready and willing to negotiate and sit down again and work out a deal which gives our members’ assurances.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments