Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Universal payment proposal to Troubles bereaved criticised

Victims Commissioner Ian Jeffers has proposed a payment to relatives of all of those killed during the Troubles in Northern Ireland.

Rebecca Black
Tuesday 02 January 2024 15:39 GMT
DUP MLA Emma Little-Pengelly (Liam McBurney/PA)
DUP MLA Emma Little-Pengelly (Liam McBurney/PA) (PA Wire)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A proposal for a universal payment to be made to relatives of all those killed in Northern Irelandā€™s Troubles has been criticised as equating victims with victim-makers.

Victims Commissioner Ian Jeffers made the proposal in a paper to the Stormont Executive Office for the payment to the families of all the bereaved, including those who were involved in paramilitary groups.

He said the move ā€œwill be contentiousā€, acknowledging some ā€œwill find it difficult to accept the idea that all bereaved families should be includedā€.

But he said he sees the value of a ā€œrecognition payment to those suggested in this paper in promoting reconciliationā€.

Ms Little Pengelly said it is ā€œrepugnant to acknowledge victim makers in the same way as the victims they createdā€.

ā€œMany victims and survivors will be deeply disappointed that the Victims Commissioner failed to take the opportunity to make clear that there is no equivalence between victim and victim maker,ā€ she said.

ā€œThe lie that reconciliation somehow demands that victims and their perpetrators be treated the same must be robustly challenged.

ā€œThis is a ridiculous suggestion, and one that causes significant hurt to many victims.

ā€œTo be clear, the DUP will stand by the innocent victims and will not endorse this proposal in its current form for the reasons stated.ā€

Kenny Donaldson, director of victims group SEFF, said there should be another approach.

He said he acknowledged that those ā€œinvolved in terrorism/other premeditated criminal violence and their families do require access to support servicesā€, but he said this should not be facilitated via victims funded resources.

He said a payment scheme for those injured ā€œwent some way to making a distinction between perpetrator and victimā€, adding: ā€œAnd so too must any future bereaved reparationā€.

ā€œFor those who were bereaved of a loved one who was involved in terrorism as a member of a proscribed group, there is a need for another approach to be developed with appropriate arbitration functions,ā€ he said.

ā€œThere is also a need for inclusion of bereaved across jurisdictions.

ā€œThat means those murdered/killed in Northern Ireland, Republic of Ireland, Great Britain and mainland Europe.

ā€œIt is up to states to find workable solutions on these issues, to work together in a spirit of partnership and collaboration.ā€

Mr Donaldson added: ā€œA chorus of people are leading the claim that society has moved on since 2009 when a universal reparation proposal for the bereaved was proposed by Eames-Bradley, this was met with righteous anger and opposition.

ā€œSociety has indeed moved on as has politics but principles and values held by large sections of those directly impacted have not, and rightly so.ā€

ā€œProposals launched today are ā€˜adviceā€™ and that is solely what they are, there is substantive debate to be held on these issues before anything could be enacted in law, our message is simple; advance a reparation for the non-controversial cases which do not involve terrorism, a different process is required to deal with those other cases which account for circa 500 deaths and 13-14% of Troubles-related deaths.ā€

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in