Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tory peer criticises plan for 'mini-jails': Criminal Justice Bill under fire

Heather Mills,Home Affairs Correspondent
Monday 10 January 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A CONSERVATIVE peer is heading a group opposing the Government's plans to lock up young offenders in specially built 'mini-prisons'.

Baroness Faithfull, a former social services director, yesterday spoke out against the pounds 100m proposals, warning that the five new 'secure training centres' were likely to turn children into worse offenders rather than rehabilitate them.

Her comments coincided with publication of a study by Save the Children, the leading children's charity, which concludes that the Government's plans are 'not well researched and an enormous waste of money'.

The remarks were timed to influence debate during tomorrow's second reading of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Bill, which includes a three-pronged increase in the severity of sentences for young offenders.

In response to public concern over juvenile crime, the Bill enables courts to make secure training orders for the centres of up to two years for persistent young offenders; to impose sentences of up to 14 years on 10- to 13-year-olds convicted of serious offences; and to send 15- to 17-year-olds to young offenders' institutions for up to two years.

But in the Bill - which also tackles such diverse issues as squatting, gypsy sites and terrorism - it is the clampdown on juveniles and the proposed removal of a defendant's right to remain silent, without jeopardising his defence, under police questioning which have aroused most opposition.

The five organisations that have joined forces behind Lady Faithfull to fight the 'mini-prisons' are the two associations for both social service directors and social workers, the two associations representing chief probation officers and probation officers, and the National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders.

In their briefing paper, Creating More Criminals, they support the use of secure accommodation for some children, but argue that most should be dealt with in supervision programmes within the community. They cite research showing that 70 to 80 per cent of young people who are locked up are likely to re-offend on release, while only 45 to 55 per cent of those on intensive non- custodial penalties will commit further crime.

It says that government advocates of the new training centres have likened them to a Northern Ireland training school, which has a reconviction rate of over 85 per cent. 'The secure training order is a step backwards in both penal policy and childcare policy and is an indefensible misuse of scarce resources,' Lady Faithfull said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in