US nuclear deterrent was used to defend Hong Kong
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Papers distributed to the Prime Minister Harold Macmillan in 1961 - and released by the national archives this week - show that military chiefs were concerned they could not hold the British colony by means of conventional warfare if China decided to take the enclave by force.
British officials decided to seek clandestine assurances from the Americans that their plans for the outbreak of war between the West and the Communist bloc would involve a nuclear strike to protect Hong Kong.
In February 1961, the Foreign Secretary Sir Alec Douglas-Home said in a letter to Macmillan: "It must be fully obvious to the Americans that Hong Kong is indefensible by conventional means and that in the event of a Chinese attack, nuclear strikes against China would be the only alternative to complete abandonment of the Colony.
"In these circumstances it is perhaps not so much formal talks with the Americans that we need so much as an informal exchange of views involving a discussion of the use of nuclear strikes."
It was pointed out by military planners that Hong Kong was particularly vulnerable, not least because its water and food supplies, from the mainland, could be cut off at any time.
Another memo to Macmillan said: "Hong Kong is no longer of vital strategic interest to us. But it has symbolic and political importance and is our only direct frontier with the Communist world."
Sir Alec continued: "We should encourage the Chinese to believe an attack on Hong Kong would involve nuclear retaliation."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments