Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Terror gas attack on Tube foiled by security agencies

Kim Sengupta
Wednesday 07 April 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A planned poison gas attack, with the London Underground as a likely target, has been foiled by the security agencies, it was claimed yesterday.

A planned poison gas attack, with the London Underground as a likely target, has been foiled by the security agencies, it was claimed yesterday.

The plot allegedly involved detonating a combined chemical and explosive "dirty bomb", producing fumes that can choke victims in a confined place. The conspiracy was uncovered after British and United States intelligence intercepted telephone calls within this country, as well as calls to Pakistan.

As well as Tube trains, passenger terminals at London Gatwick and Heathrow airports are believed to have been in the list of targets. However, it is believed the plot was exposed before the alleged terror cells had reached the position to carry out an attack. Security sources said yesterday that the attack involved the use of a chemical called osmium tetroxide in an explosion. However, security experts last night questioned whether such a chemical could be used in an attack by terrorists.

The substance turns from solid to gas in confined space and is highly corrosive to eyes, skin tissue and lungs, producing a symptom called "dry land drowning". It is believed that a fertiliser-based explosive would have been part of the package.

The telephone calls between the alleged plotters were intercepted by GCHQ in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, and the US National Security Agency. Al-Qa'ida leaders have been warning of a chemical attack since the 1999 bombings of the World Trade Centre in New York, and handbooks have been produced on how to manufacture "dirty bombs".

However, so far, the organisation and its affiliates had only carried out attacks with conventional explosives, and some experts pointed out yesterday that osmium tetroxide, which has a legitimate scientific use, did not fit the usual profile of a typical chemical warfare agent. They said handling the chemical would be potentially dangerous for would-be bombmakers.

Professor Alastair Hay, professor of environmental toxicology at Leeds University, said the substance, known as a "rare catalyst" a chemical that speeds experiments, could be used to speed up an explosion.

But he added: "It would not be in the same category as some radioactive substance which would continue to emit radiation and cause a problem in terms of clean-up. This would be something present, like a heavy metal lead, in the environment. I don't think it would be a major hazard and clean-up would not be a major problem."

Dr Steve Simpson, a senior lecturer in chemistry at the University of Salford, who works with the substance, said: "If you get the vapour in your eyes, even a small amount, it can turn them brown or black and you could be permanently blinded. It is so volatile that one could be in appreciable danger just opening a bottle. If one had 10 grams and opened it up in a normal-sized room, within a couple of minutes it would cause people's eyes to stream. Some people might feel a bit tight in the chest. It would cause massive panic."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in