Robin Hood and his merry minor officials
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Robin Hood, the gentleman knight who lost his title when he dared to cross Prince John, was probably no more than a lowly forester.
New research suggests that the outlaw was not the romantic nobleman of legend, but a sort of civil servant whose misdemeanours later forced him to live in the greenwood.
The research, to be published in the journal of the Past and Present Society, is based on an analysis of the 15th-century Robin Hood rhymes by two academics.
"A huge amount has been written about Robin Hood over the past 100 years, but most of it has been about whether or not there was such a character," said Richard Almond of Darlington College, who wrote the report with Professor Tony Pollard of Teesside University.
"Our work is aimed at trying to pinpoint the social level which he came from.
"Until now there have been two schools of thought, that he was an aristocrat or that he was a peasant. We say he was in the middle."
Almond, one of the world's leading experts on medieval hunting, examined the poems for clues to Robin Hood's real background. "People had looked at the poems but not at the significance of the language," he says.
"Our suggestion is that he was a forest official who had done something wrong and who had fled into the greenwood. It is based on the use of hunting and falconry terms in the rhymes."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments