Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Oil-row businessman aims to score against Chelsea owner

Greg Harkin
Sunday 25 September 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Henry Cameron, a 65-year-old former solicitor, could knock Chelsea off their perch if he succeeds in a legal action seeking £500m from a business associated with the club's super-rich owner, Roman Abramovich. He claims that the Russian was involved in share deals that cost him a 50 per cent stake in a £1bn Siberian oil fields venture.

Instead of making his fortune, he says, he ended up with 1 per cent of the business, after directors of the Russian firm Sibneft issued thousands of new shares in the business to their own subsidiary companies.

The Scot is a director of Russian-owned Sibir, which struck a deal with Sibneftto jointly develop oil fields in Siberia.

Mr Abramovich is named in a lawsuit launched by Mr Cameron's company in the British Virgin Islands, where the case is being heard because a number of co-accused firms are registered there.

Mr Abramovich's spokes-man, John Mann, insisted his boss had acted legitimately.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in