Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Noye jury considers verdict overnight

Pat Clarke,Pa News
Thursday 13 April 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Old Bailey jury trying motorway killer Kenneth Noye has been sent to a hotel overnight to consider its verdict.

Noye, 52, from Sevenoaks, Kent, has denied murdering Stephen Cameron during a road rage incident on the M25 Swanley interchange on May 19, 1996.

Prosecution allege he stabbed the 21-year-old in anger "and maybe pride" when he found he was not winning in the fight.

Mr Cameron from Swanley, Kent, was stabbed in the heart and liver.

Before he sent the jury out, Lord Justice Latham told them that the core of the case was the question of self-defence.

"Might Mr Noye have been acting in self-defence when he used the knife?

"Or do you think when he got out the knife it was to confront Stephen Cameron or even up the odds so he did not leave the scene a beaten man?

"But even if you conclude he may have believed he needed to defend himself, you still have to consider the very important question of whether the use of the knife was really out of all proportion to the incident."

The judge warned the jury that the alternative verdict of manslaughter was "not there as some easy, simple way of coming to a compromise if there are different views among you.

"You can only bring in a verdict of manslaughter if you are genuinely satisfied there was unlawful violence but that there was not the requisite intent - or that he was provoked."

At 4:30pm the judge called the jury back into court and when he was told that the eight women and four men were not on the verge of making a decision he sent them to a hotel for the night.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in