Minor British Institutions: Princess Kate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Hello, Princess. But which one: the beautiful, dutiful and discreet; or the beautiful, wayward and wilful? Kate can look to two marriers-in who provide equally outstanding examples of either: Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, her husband's great grandmother, and Diana Spencer, her ghostly mother-in-law.
It's easy to see which one might haunt her. But, as history shows, predicting the progress of princesses is tricky. The ghostly mother-in-law, after all, looked a tremendous bet on her day in 1981, as far as we knew – which turned out to be not very far.
The new princess is another breath of fresh hair and heirs, and shows every sign of enjoying her duty. But she will have to endure two other ancient Minor British Institutions, Sneering at Parvenus and Jeering at Royalty. (William the Conqueror, for example, had a terrible time over his mother being a tanner's daughter, considered almost as bad as an air hostess.)
So keep that tiara tight and smile, smile, smile.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments