Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Maff insists it was right to cull healthy animals

Slaughter

Ben Russell,Political Correspondent
Friday 20 April 2001 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Thousands of animals slaughtered on suspicion of having foot-and-mouth disease were not infected, subsequent blood tests have shown.

Thousands of animals slaughtered on suspicion of having foot-and-mouth disease were not infected, subsequent blood tests have shown.

More than half of cases where vets were in doubt about the presence of the disease later tested negative, the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food said.

But Maff officials and farmers' leaders insisted that culling animals on suspicion of having the disease was essential to prevent the possible spread of foot-and-mouth while laboratory tests were done.

Details of the extent of the preventive slaughter came after news that livestock on the farm that prompted the cancellation of this year's National Hunt Festival at Cheltenham eventually tested negative for the disease.

A total of 186 cattle, 190 ewes and 100 lambs were slaughtered at Bozard Farm, in Woolstone, just a short distance from Cheltenham racecourse after vets found clinical signs of the disease. Livestock was also culled at neighbouring farms.

A spokesman for Maff said livestock had been slaughtered on suspicion at about 160 farms. But no disease had been found in "more than half" of cases. Maff officials insist it is essential to cull animals on suspicion to prevent disease spreading while vets await test results. Under the Government's slaughter policy, vets have discretion to order a cull if they suspect livestock have foot-and-mouth disease.

In clear-cut cases, vets diagnose cases from clinical symptoms alone, and confirm an outbreak in a telephone call to Maff's national disease control centre in London, triggering an immediate cull of animals on the infected farm and neighbouring holdings.

In cases where vets are unsure, they can order a cull of animals on the suspect farm, but slaughter on neighbouring premises is put on hold until the disease is confirmed.

A Maff spokesman said: "Test results take four to five days to come through because there are a series of tests for foot-and-mouth.

"We can't wait for five days to cull the animals, but when farms are culled on suspicion we don't do the contiguous cull until those results come through one way or another. We are trying to make a proportionate response. We need to stamp out the disease, but we need to be proportionate as unnecessary slaughter holds up the disposal of animals."

Edward Gillespie, managing director of Cheltenham Racecourse, dismissed suggestions that the Gold Cup festival could have been saved had the Woolstone case not emerged.

Cases confirmed in the nearby villages of Teddington and Boddington would have forced the race meeting to be cancelled in any event, he said.

"Maff are still treating it as a confirmed case. My reaction was one of extreme sorrow for the farmers and their neighbours all of whom lost their stock," he said.

The National Farmers' Union backed the cull. "With a virus of this nature it's understandable to err on the side of caution because it can spread very quickly. It's galling for farmers but it would be more galling if there was a suspect case which spread while farmers were waiting for tests."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in