Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mad cow disease tests were 'flawed'

Charles Arthur
Thursday 14 June 2001 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tests across Europe for signs of BSE in cattle show no signs of an epidemic, but they used "flawed" systems ­ as revealed by The Independent in December ­ that have never been scientifically validated.

Results trumpeted by the Food Standards Agency (FSA) yesterday showed that of 1.7 million cattle tested in the first four months of the year on arrival at abattoirs on the Continent and in the UK, only 76 tested positive. Of those, none came from Britain, though only 30 were tested here, compared with thousands in Belgium, France, Germany, Holland, Italy, the Republic of Ireland and Spain.

But the three tests used and approved by the European Commission are deemed to be flawed because scientists do not know how effective they are at revealing BSE in cattle that do not have symptoms. As Dr Heinz Schimmel, who validated the tests at the Commission'ss Joint Research Centre, told The Independent in December, a negative result would not necessarily mean an animal was free of BSE. "Nobody can do that," he said.

That contradicts the Commission, which insists that a negative test means the animal is safe to eat. Statistical studies, however, have shown that in any group of infected animals, a significant number will be incubating BSE, which can take four or five years to produce symptoms.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in