Foster's 'gherkin' in the City gets go-ahead
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Norman Foster's controversial design for the redevelopment of the site of the Baltic Exchange building in the City was given the go-ahead yesterday, after the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, decided there was no need for a public inquiry.
Norman Foster's controversial design for the redevelopment of the site of the Baltic Exchange building in the City was given the go-ahead yesterday, after the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, decided there was no need for a public inquiry.
The 594ft tapered tower, nicknamed "the gherkin", was given planning permission by the Corporation of London, and Mr Prescott said that the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) did not need to call the plans in for closer inspection.
The Grade II-listed Baltic Exchange building, which was severely damaged by an IRA bomb in 1992, will be levelled to make way for the new 41-storey tower. There have beenobjections to Lord Foster's scheme, but the DETR said Mr Prescott had taken account of English Heritage's recommendation that the "old Baltic Exchange could be not properly preserved and that it could... be replaced by a new high-quality building".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments