Estate owners break access deal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Up to a third of owners of historic houses who receive grants on condition that they open their properties to the public are failing to allow access, the Government's spending watchdog reports today.
Of 460 grant recipients who were contacted by English Heritage so their names could be put on a website, 100 failed to reply. Of the remaining 360 whose properties were listed on the site as being open, 40 did not respond to inquiries from researchers working for the National Audit Office. A further 12 refused outright to allow visitors, in breach of agreements they struck when they received their grants.
When owners of listed buildings receive funding from English Heritage to carry out repairs, they must agree to allow public access for the following 10 years. In 1998-99, 177 properties were awarded grants totalling £7.52m. The NAO said it was concerned both about the failure of owners to comply and about the efficiency of English Heritage's public information system about the properties.
Half the owners said they needed at least a week's notice of visits by members of the public, and half charged a fee for entry. In one case, the NAO's researchers were told they would have to pay £50 to visit, and in another that the house was open only to groups for a minimum of £100.
Although many of the researchers who visited houses found the owners informative and friendly, others received a frosty reception. One owner "had nothing to say. He just opened up and stood and waited for us to leave so he could lock up", according to one visitor.
David Davis, chairman of the Commons Public Accounts Committee, said English Heritage should do more to ensure that obligations were honoured. "English Heritage should not tolerate any such disregard for the rights of the public and it needs to do much more to monitor compliance with access conditions," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments