Constitution altered 'Ã la carte' by Prince
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Prince of Wales has been accused by a Labour MP of changing the constitution by stealth "under the smokescreen of the general election" with his forthcoming marriage to Camilla Parker Bowles.
The Independent has learnt that before the Prince publicly announced his marriage plans, ministers privately discussed legislation to allow a morganatic marriage - the marriage of a person of royal blood to a person of inferior rank, under which the latter would not receive the royal rank nor would the children inherit royal titles or property.
A ministerial source said a Bill would be rushed through to stop Mrs Parker Bowles becoming Queen, but not before the Prince of Wales inherited the Crown.
Ministers have been keen to avoid being dragged into a constitutional row over the marriage, insisting that the wedding by itself raises no overriding constitutional issues.
Andrew MacKinlay, Labour MP for Thurrock, broke ranks yesterday by calling on Tony Blair to hold a constitutional conference. "Under the smokescreen of a general election, Prince Charles is changing the constitution à la carte," said Mr MacKinlay. "He is entitled to marry who he likes but the custodians of the constitution are here," he told Peter Hain, the Leader of the Commons.
He said Stanley Baldwin, the Prime Minister at the time of the abdication in 1936, said there was no provision in the British system for a morganatic marriage. "Perhaps you should legislate for that, because if you don't, Camilla will become Queen."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments