Clergy 'jobs for life' under threat from Synod
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans to end the 800-year-old system that guarantees vicars jobs for life are being considered by the Church of England.
Plans to end the 800-year-old system that guarantees vicars jobs for life are being considered by the Church of England.
Delegates at the General Synod discussed replacing the church's current terms of service with proposals that would allow lazy or incompetent clergy to be sacked and bring in regular reviews of their performance.
Even bishops could be removed from their post under the measures unveiled yesterday during the four-day February Sessions at Church House in Westminster. Legal ownership of housing would also transfer to a local diocese.
Under the proposals, the parson's freehold, the ancient system under which thousands of clergy are virtually guaranteed a job for life, would be replaced by "common tenure" which would make the posts open-ended until retirement age and protected by employment law.
The measures form part of a report by Professor David McLean which calls for better conditions for priests by making church law mirror section 23 of the Employment Rights Act. He has denied the plans were designed to weed out mavericks.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments