Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Camelot in legal challenge

Friday 25 August 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

National Lottery operator Camelot Group Plc has launched a legal challenge to the Lottery Commission's decision to negotiate only with its rival for the next contract to run the game.

National Lottery operator Camelot Group Plc has launched a legal challenge to the Lottery Commission's decision to negotiate only with its rival for the next contract to run the game.

A High Court judge agreed to hear Camelot's request for a judicial review on Tuesday, the company said in a statement.

The current operator of the National Lottery said it had decided to seek redress through the courts after the Commission said it would negotiate solely with Sir Richard's consortium.

The Virgin tycoon has been given a month to come up with a guaranteed £50 million emergency fund to back-up his bid to hold the licence for the next seven years.

Sir Richard says he is confident of being able to satisfy the Lottery Commission and snatching the prize licence from Camelot.

The Commission is demanding clarification on the contingency fund needed in the event of low revenues or unforeseen costs.

Sir Richard said he believed Camelot had been treated fairly by the Lottery Commission - but he said it must be now left to the courts to decide.

end

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in