The Westminster Scandal: Labour rebels paid high price: The Surcharges
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SURCHARGING of councillors over their failure to carry out their legally held duties is a concept more familiar to Labour politicians attempting to buck the line laid down by the government of the day than their Tory counterparts.
The most celebrated cases came just as the Labour Party nationally was trying to rebuild its image to turn it into a credible electoral force in the mid-1980s. Its rebellious councillors did nothing to enhance the process.
Most significantly were two figures who loomed large in Conservative demonology: Derek Hatton on Liverpool City Council, and Ted Knight, of the south London borough of Lambeth.
They were not alone, of course. A total of 80 Labour councillors were surcharged more than pounds 200,000 by the High Court in 1986 for their failure to set a rate by the start of the financial year in April.
The councillors in both Liverpool and Lambeth had reasoned that they should have received more money from central government grants and had delayed for many weeks until June that year in the hope of this money coming through.
The three High Court judges agreed with the district auditors who had maintained that not to set a rate within weeks, or possibly even within days of the deadline, was unreasonable.
It was held that the councillors had taken the decisions for extraneous and improper reasons to do with 'mere political posturing' in an effort to put pressure on the Conservative government.
Each group of councillors - 48 from Lambeth and 32 from Liverpool - was to be surcharged pounds 106,000 which Liverpool and Lambeth councils' coffers had lost through failure to establish a rate.
Those who failed to pay the surcharge were declared bankrupt and barred from local authority office for five years.
But the then Labour leader, Neil Kinnock, refused to become embroiled in the matter, despite calls that if the Labour Party came to power he should retrospectively indemnify the councillors, aware of the damage the row over the surcharging of Clay Cross members 11 years earlier.
In that case, 11 Labour councillors on the Derbyshire council, including the brother of Dennis Skinner, the MP for Bolsover, had also failed to implement rent increases in line with the Housing Finance Act. They were eventually declared bankrupt, owing the princely sum of pounds 6,985.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments