Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The Unemployment Debate: Minister 'accepts 5 million jobless'

Barrie Clement,Labour Editor
Wednesday 20 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE Government has accepted that the real level of unemployment is 5 million, according to John Prescott, Labour's employment spokesman.

A parliamentary answer by Michael Forsyth, Minister of State for Employment, conceded that under a wider definition of the jobless figures suggested by Mr Prescott an additional 2.2 million people would be added to the official 2.8 million. Mr Prescott said: 'These figures, from the Government's own surveys, reveal the massive extent of unemployment in Britain under the Tories.'

Labour's employment spokesman argued that a far more accurate picture of unemployment could be seen by adding to the official data all those who would like to work but did not have a job. Under Mr Prescott's definition, all those who had looked for a job within the four weeks prior to being questioned, or were waiting to start a job but were not available for work within two weeks, would also be included.

Mr Forsyth pointed out in his answer that the additional categories were defined as 'economically inactive' under the guidelines issued by the UN International Labour Organisation: 'The majority of people who say they want work but are not actively seeking it are students; looking after a family or home; or long-term sick/disabled.'

The clash is part of the continuing battle between Mr Prescott and Whitehall over the accuracy of the official statistics. The Government's figures only include people who are claiming unemployment benefit, but Mr Presoctt claims that is a gross underestimate of the true position.

Labour has accused the Government of reducing the 'claimant count' by redefining the groups which qualify for benefit as part of 30 changes to the calculations since the Conservatives came to power in 1979.

Mr Prescott has been denounced by senior Department of Employment civil servants for impugning their integrity, but he said yesterday that he was trying to engage in an intelligent debate on the true level of unemployment.

'Time and again we are rubbished when we say that their official figures only tell part of the story, but now we have the conclusive proof from one of the Government's own ministers,' Mr Prescott said. 'Surely, now the Government will have to admit the need to look again at how unemployment is estimated in this country, so that people can see the real scale of the crisis and judge the Tories on their shameful record.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in