Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The Royal Commission on Pollution: Rapid growth of air traffic challenged

Martin Whitfield
Thursday 27 October 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The anomoly in which airlines pay no tax on aviation fuel should end, the commission says. The Government should negotiate with the European Union member states and possibly others to introduce an environmental levy on the kerosene used by jets.

The inexorable growth in international air transport, like the rise in road traffic, was challenged by the commission.

Acceptance that projected demand for additional air services and airport facilities must be met was said to be incompatible with the aim of sustainable development.

Air travel consumes a sixth of the energy used by the transport sector and is the most rapidly growing mode.

The number of passengers on international flights to and from United Kingdom airports has more than doubled in the past 10 years.

Although the commission accepted that it was difficult to assess environmental damage caused by aircraft emissions, it concluded that there were risks to the upper atmosphere.

'There is a powerful case on environmental grounds for regulatory action to avert what could be irreversible damage to the earth's atmosphere from the growth of air transport, or at least serious damage of a long-term nature,' it reports.

The commission recommends that international regulations are extended to cover aircraft emissions at all phases of flight, not just landing and take-off, that Britain supports more stringent noise certification standards and that the Government collaborates in research into the possible effects of supersonic aircraft on the stratosphere.

The commission says any deregulation of the European air market should not follow the American pattern which resulted in the use of smaller aircraft, lower load factors and an increase in emissions per passenger-kilometre. It recommends that all proposals for deregulation are accompanied by a full environmental assessment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in