The Labour Party in Brighton: Party to ignore anti-Trident vote: Defence debate told motion out of step with policy, writes Donald Macintyre
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JOHN SMITH left Brighton yesterday predicting a Labour general election victory after his win over union opponents on internal party democracy and undeterred by a unilateralist conference vote in favour of scrapping Trident.
The conference approved by a majority of five to four a resolution from the furniture trades union, FTAT, against a recommendation by the national executive. But party officials insisted last night that it would not shape party policy in the run-up to the next election.
They pointed to the fact that the conference had already approved a multilateralist resolution from the steel union, ISTC, and that the majority was less than the two-thirds that would require it to be taken into account when drawing up the manifesto.
The conference also voted in favour of defence expenditure being reduced to the European average - the fifth successive year such a cut has been demanded - plus a package to convert military research and industry to civil purposes.
Yesterday's debate produced its traditional passion for cuts and disarmament, which Labour's opponents frequently use to attack the party. Tony Benn told delegates: 'We need a massive transfer of resources from military waste to the means of life.'
David Coates, of the FTAT, said that money saved by scrapping the programme could fund public services: 'How can we expect the Third World to forswear nuclear weapons when they see the First World armed to the teeth?'
But the conference chairman, Tony Clarke, pleaded with delegates to oppose the Trident motion, which he said was out of step with Labour's approach to
disarmament.
Malcom Rifkind, the Secretary of State for Defence, said that the defence decisions meant not only scrapping the nuclear deterrent but also reducing defence expenditure 'by the equivalent of the whole of the Royal Navy's budget'. He said they betrayed 'the true face of the Labour Party', and added that 'these votes show why they (Labour) remain unfit to govern'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments