Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The kids just don't want to give up

Thousands use 'E' every week and only suffer a headache, says Liz Hunt

Liz Hunt
Monday 24 July 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Attempts to deter teenagers from taking drugs by focusing on the health risks are rarely successful. Apart from glue-sniffing and its occasionally fatal consequences, the evidence is minimal for seriously damaging effects on physical well-being by such drugs as cannabis, amphetamines, LSD and even Ecstasy.

There have been several high-profile deaths linked with the use of Ecstasy at raves and dance clubs, and between 40 and 50 deaths have been attributed to the drug since the late Eighties. However there are hundreds of thousands of people using "E" week after week without suffering anything more serious than a bad headache.

Teenagers who smoke cannabis, the most popular of illegal drugs in this age-group, run the same kind of risks as those who smoke cigarettes. Cannabis smoke contains several carcinogens and tends to be held in the lungs for longer than tobacco smoke, resulting in an increased deposit of tar. The World Health Organisation is investigating a link between the drug and cancer of the lungs, upper airways and voice-box after anecdotal reports of an increase in the number of younger patients with these conditions and a history of joint smoking.

The WHO will report later this year, but whatever its finding few believe it will put young people off cannabis. Intensive national and local anti- smoking campaigns have so far failed to combat the attractions of cigarettes despite incontrovertible evidence for their damaging effects.

Stimulant drugs such as amphetamines, when used for months at a time, will suppress the appetite, and can damage teeth and bones by leaching out calcium. In the long-run they contribute to the user feeling run-down and washed out, and it can take several months to recover their weight and general well-being. Some youngsters, still flirting with grunge, would view these side-effects of amphetamine use as an attractive bonus.

Drug experts and youth workers are less blase about the possible mental health consequences of some of the drugs used by schoolchildren. There is some evidence that LSD, magic mushrooms and other psychoactive chemicals, can result in long-term problems, ranging from depression to more serious psychological disturbances.

New strains of cannabis now gaining popularity, such as "skunk", "northern lights" and "buds" have a much higher concentration of tetrahydrocannabinol, the active ingredient, and border on the hallucinogenic. Their use is likely to be more widespread than that of LSD.

But evidence for drug use resulting in mental problems has so far been limited to isolated cases. The fundamental questions remain unanswered: can drugs actually cause mental problems in otherwise healthy individuals, or do they act as a trigger for an existing condition which might have manifested itself later in the user's life anyway?

Until there is more evidence, using health risks to scare would-be younger users is likely to be no more effective than wielding the moral arguments against drugs. Horror stories will have limited impact because for every death or injury associated with the drug, a teenager is likely to know several people who have been using it safely for months, even years.

Drug counsellors believe that to make any impact on the escalating drugs problem in schools, children have to be given accurate information which allows them to make informed choices. If a drug doesn't cause problems, then they should be told so.

There are other arguments against using illegal drugs; the consequences of a criminal conviction, the risk of incurring huge debts, and the effect on the user's future career choices if he or she is known to have used drugs. And these, in the event, are likely to be rather more effective.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in