Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tests review 'to take months': The Victims

Martin Whitfield
Thursday 26 August 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PATIENTS face an agonising wait of months before they know if their cancer diagnosis was accurate.

The review of more than 2,000 cases handled by Dr Carol Starkie, consultant pathologist at Selly Oak Hospital, Birmingham, can only be done by a handful of experts and is expected to take several months.

A full clinical review of all 42 wrongly identified cases is to be undertaken by a team of surgeons, radiologists and cancer specialists. But the retesting of patients from as far back as 1985 could lead to long delays before the results are known.

South Birmingham Health Authority commissioned one pathologist to examine the 473 samples taken in the previous 12 months once the inquiry was launched in May. By the middle of this week, he had completed the review of just 192 samples.

Discussions are being held with other hospitals but it appears unlikely that they will be able to test more than 500 samples a month without disruption to testing of new patients.

'There are major logistical problems in undertaking the re-examination of just over 2,000 tissue samples,' the authority admitted. The investigation at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital was ordered after two patients, Matthew Guest, aged 9, and Debbie Leary, 14, were wrongly diagnosed and received chemotherapy treatment for cancer they did not have.

Tony Hall, solicitor for the Guest family, said: 'I have seen Matthew and he looks fine but I have seen no medical report which says he will not suffer long-term side effects from the treatment he received.'

Colin Lovatt, of Tunstall, near Stoke-on-Trent, said last night that doctors had made two mistakes when they diagnosed his daughter Michelle as suffering from cancer. He said Ms Lovatt, now 20, was told she had a malignant tumour in her right leg and was given chemotherapy.

Days later, they decided the tumour was benign and surgeons removed part of her leg bone. Three weeks later, Ms Lovatt was called back to the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital when doctors decided after a fresh examination of tests that the tumour was malignant. She went through a second spell of more powerful chemotherapy before the treatment was halted when it was decided again that the tumour was benign.

Her father said: 'It is bad enough for a mistake to be made once, but twice is just unbelievable. Michelle has been through hell twice over. We are just appalled.'

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in