Test case victory for immigrant
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Immigrants yesterday won an important High Court ruling which supports the right of well-established couples to stay together and not be split up by deportation - even if a husband, wife or partner has broken immigration rules.
In a test case, a judge quashed a Home Office decision to proceed with the deportation of a Ghanaian husband, Benjamin Amankwah, of Plaistow, east London, who had overstayed his permission to remain in the UK.
He ruled that there had been a 'perverse' failure by the Home Secretary to comply with his department's own policy guidelines, introduced in January, to protect family life.
At least 16 other cases were awaiting the outcome of today's hearing.
Mr Justice Popplewell said instructions had been given by the Home Office Enforcement Policy Group that, where a person being considered for deportation in a non-criminal case had been in a genuine marriage or cohabitation with a person settled in the UK for two years or more, as a general rule deportation should not be pursued.
A Home Office spokeswoman said: 'We shall very seriously consider today's judgment and then decided whether or not to appeal.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments