Stuntman loses case against Oliver Reed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A FORMER stuntman yesterday lost his High Court action for damages against the actor, Oliver Reed, who he claimed injured him during drunken horseplay while filming on location in the Seychelles, writes James Cusick.
Mr Justice Owen dismissed an action for damages by Reg Prince, in which he alleged Mr Reed, 55, deliberately tipped him over a restaurant balustrade during a break in shooting the film Castaway more than seven years ago.
The stuntman, who claimed the back injury he suffered ended his career, had been one of Mr Reed's best friends, acting as stand-in and, some believed, his 'minder'.
But, in 1986, during the filming of Castaway, starring Mr Reed and Amanda Donohue, the friendship ended after a Sunday drinking binge went out of control.
The judge said that what exactly occurred then had to be discovered 'through the mists and vapours of drink'. And drink was a 'notorious enemy of sense, manners and memory'.
Mr Prince alleged that Mr Reed had thrown him off the pier of La Reserve restaurant. He had fallen 10 or 11 feet on to the beach, fracturing his back. He blamed Mr Reed, but not straight away. The judge asked 'Why not?' He suggested this was because there was no justifiable complaint.
Mr Reed's version of events - that he had been attacked by the stuntman brandishing a knife, sidestepped him, and Mr Prince went over - was also questioned.
John 'Ginger' Hughes, the third member of the drinking party, had told the court that all three were 'pizzled'. The judge said no one was lying, but 'three men out for lunch and you get childish behaviour'.
After the case, Mr Reed said he felt sad. 'I've lost a good friend.' However, he did not rule out a reconciliation.
Dear Ollie, page 19
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments