Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Street trader charged pounds 10 for trinkets

Tuesday 12 January 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A STREET TRADER who charged tourists pounds 10 for sets of cheap fake gold jewellery was ordered to pay a fine and costs totalling more than pounds 200 yesterday.

After the hearing the trader, Oliver Wain-Ferns, said the jewellery - which cost him pounds 1.84 a set - was easy to sell to gullible tourists. 'But I find the English even more gullible than the tourists. They snap them up.'

Horseferry Road court in central London was told that Wain- Ferns, 31, of James Street, Marylebone, was arrested while trading illegally outside Harrods in Knightsbridge in the run-up to Christmas.

The magistrate, Roger Davis, said to him: 'You make a very large profit, don't you? And this stuff is very cheap, isn't it?

'Each item is only worth about 1p, and I know that from a recent case I had.'

Wain-Ferns, who admitted six counts of obstructing the footway and trading without a licence, replied: 'They're worth a bit more than that.'

He was fined pounds 144 with pounds 60 costs, and was ordered to pay outstanding fines of pounds 275 at pounds 10 a week.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in