Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Stonehenge roads will go, says minister

Oliver Gillie
Friday 08 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE DREAM of Stonehenge in the centre of a large park uncluttered by roads will be fulfilled, a minister pledged yesterday. The existing A344 and A303, which pass within yards of the monument, will be grassed over and a new road will be built out of sight.

Steven Norris, Under-Secretary of State in the Department of Transport, said that two routes which have been proposed by his officials are non-starters and that he was prepared to consider a tunnel if no other solution could be found. He gave the undertaking in answer to a question from Jocelyn Stevens, chairman of English Heritage, at a conference on the future of Stonehenge held at the Queen Elizabeth Centre, London.

A route which bypasses Stonehenge to the south would not survive the parliamentary process, Mr Norris said, and enlargement of the existing A303 with a small tunnel adjacent to Stonehenge satisfied no one. Mr Norris recognised the formidable political opposition ranged against the two solutions favoured by his officials.

Sir Angus Stirling, director general of the National Trust, warned that if any route infringed inalienable National Trust land then it would take the issue to Parliament and the plan would most likely be thrown out. Lord Chorley, chairman of the National Trust, said: 'We have very seldom used this procedure but if you don't use it with an issue of this magnitude then when do you use it?'

While Mr Norris said that finance will have to be found for a pounds 250m tunnel if there is no other acceptable option, he was confident that would not happen. Department of Transport officials have sketched out a new northern route which will cost between pounds 30m and pounds 50m. However, a number of possible problems with this route have yet to be fully investigated. It passes near a sensitive archaeological site, Fargo Wood, and near Army married quarters.

As the new northern route gains favour, some disadvantages of an expensive two- and-a-half-mile tunnel passing under Stonehenge and the most sensitive archaeological sites have begun to emerge. The tunnel will require large portals, link roads and ventilation shafts.

A number of objections were also made to the tunnel on the grounds that it might change people's perception of Stonehenge if they were aware of a massive technological structure beneath the monument, even if they could not see it.

This knowledge would lessen the mystery of Stonehenge, Richard Coleman, deputy secretary of the Royal Fine Art Commission, maintained. 'If I was a dowser, I would be very unhappy about the tunnel,' he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in