Sleeper trains face axe as subsidy is cut
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Several sleeper train services look certain to be scrapped after Roger Salmon, BR's franchising director, announced they would no longer be subsidised.
Mr Salmon said he would safeguard sleeper services from London to Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Inverness by continuing to subsidise them, but he felt the trains from London to Carlisle and Fort William were "disproportionately uneconomic". He said the high cost per passenger "leads me to conclude that the subsidy for these services is better used supporting other services, in particular, rural services in Scotland".
Mr Salmon also indicated that the sleeper service between Plymouth and Edinburgh and Glasgow would no longer be subsidised "for the same reason".
The Fort William sleeper service is one of Europe's finest railway journeys. Passengers leave London in darkness and wake up amid lochs and mountains. The journey is popular with tourists, and Scottish councils have pledged to fight any attempt to downgrade or scrap it.
But without subsidy from British Rail, it is difficult to envisage the councils having sufficient resources to enable the threatened services to continue operating.
BR managers say that losses of £1m suffered during the recent signalworkers' strike, coupled with new track-access and rolling-stock leasing costs, have forced them to reconsider the future of the loss-making sleeper services.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments