Cabinet Secretary blocked from giving evidence on partygate to committee
The hearing was due to discuss the Downing Street parties, civil service appointments, and job cuts.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Cabinet Secretary Simon Case and Government ethics chief Darren Tierney have been blocked from giving evidence about Downing Street parties before a parliamentary committee.
The pair were due to give evidence as part of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee’s inquiry into the propriety of governance in the wake of Greensill.
The hearing was confirmed several weeks ago, and it was due to discuss the Downing Street parties, as well as the management of conflicts of interest and unregulated appointments in the civil service, and the proposed cuts to the civil service of 100,000 jobs.
However, the committee was then told that ministerial approval for the pair to appear had been pulled. The hearing has now been rescheduled to June 28.
Committee chair William Wragg said the decision to pull the hearing at short notice “puts Government transparency in poor light”.
“The session with the Cabinet Secretary was an important one considering the number of propriety and ethics issues on the agenda”, he said.
“We had also hoped to get clarity on the Government’s plans for civil service reform, public scrutiny of which was much needed after they were briefed to the press last weekend.
“The intervention to pull the session at such short notice evades timely parliamentary scrutiny of these plans and puts Government transparency in a poor light.”
Mr Case had to remove himself from the inquiry into the parties – to be replaced by Sue Gray – after reports emerged of a gathering in the Cabinet Office.
It was reported the do had been organised by a private secretary in Mr Case’s team, and that it was included in digital calendars as: “Christmas party!” and included an online quiz.
The Cabinet Office said Mr Case played no part in the event, “but walked through the team’s office on the way to his own office”, and he avoided receiving a fine.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.