Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sex Lessons Outcry: Governors' freedom to be extended in autumn: Governing bodies decide what pupils learn

Judith Judd,Education Editor
Thursday 24 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PRIMARY SCHOOL governors have complete freedom to decide what must be covered in sex education lessons, John Patten, the Secretary of State for Education, said yesterday.

In theory, Mr Patten has power to intervene, but in practice he is unlikely to do so. All schools must provide sex education. This autumn, primary school governors will receive even more power enabling them to decide whether and when to provide sex education.

Ministers are keen to encourage sex education as part of their campaign to restore traditional moral values but are sensitive to the concerns of their own supporters about young children receiving inappropriate teaching.

The new legislation means that secondary schools will be required to provide sex education, including topics on HIV and Aids, but parents will have a new right to withdraw their children from the lessons.

The Government agreed to change the law after members of the House of Lords protested that teaching guidelines on Aids for 11-year-olds contained 'deviant sexual practices'.

A draft circular from the Government made clear that sex education must 'have regard to moral considerations and the value of family life'. Mr Patten has emphasised lessons should concentrate on values rather than the mechanics of sex. Next month's circular will offer some ideas about how this might be done.

Highfield did not behave unusually in inviting an outsider to talk about a subject many teachers find embarrassing. Mr Patten said teacher training in sex education must be improved.

The National Union of Teachers said a nurse might be the appropriate person to help with sex education in a school. The Royal College of Nursing said Mrs Brady was 'very well qualified' but that nationally the training for school nurses was patchy.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in