Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Separated couple called daughter by different names, court hears

The case resembles a storyline on BBC Radio 4 soap opera ‘The Archers’

Brian Farmer
Monday 29 August 2016 21:59 BST
Comments
When giving evidence, the father admitted ‘other people might think’ the double naming ‘was a bad idea’
When giving evidence, the father admitted ‘other people might think’ the double naming ‘was a bad idea’ (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

A separated couple called their three-year-old daughter different names, a family court judge has heard.

The pair became embroiled in a dispute over where the little girl should live, with the details emerging in a ruling by a judge.

The case echoes a domestic abuse storyline featuring a separated couple on BBC Radio 4 soap opera The Archers.

Listeners have heard that characters Rob and Helen cannot agree on the name of their son. Rob calls him Gideon and Helen calls him Jack.

Mr Justice Hayden analysed the girl’s case at a hearing in the Family Division of the High Court in London.

He said the girl lived with her father in London and her American mother lived in New York.

The woman wanted the judge to order the girl’s return to New York – where she had been born – but the judge refused the woman’s application.

He concluded the girl was "habitually resident" in the UK and integrated into London life.

Mr Justice Hayden said in a written ruling that a "striking fact of this case is that both parents call their child by a different name."

He said the man had told, when giving evidence, how "other people might think this was a bad idea" and had offered to use the name chosen by the girl’s mother.

The judge said that none of those involved could be identified.

He said the woman had become pregnant following a short "intense" relationship when the man was visiting New York on a business trip.

The girl had moved to London to live with her father nearly two years ago – with her mother’s agreement.

© Press Association

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in