Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Security of cars not reflected in price

Danny Penman
Wednesday 03 August 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

EXPENSIVE cars are no safer from thieves than cheap ones, according to a report by the Consumers' Association today, writes Danny Penman.

To assess security, the association tried to break into a range of test cars, from a Rover Metro to a Mercedes C180, and estimated the value of any standard security features.

The Rover Metro was more secure than a Mercedes C180 according to the study. In general, Rover and Ford cars were given the highest security rating.

Kevin Jones, spokesman for Rover, said: 'It isn't a surprise to us. We've worked hard on security - it's our number one priority.'

Doug Wallace, spokesman for Mercedes, said he accepted the reports findings but added: 'It is our policy to give the buyer the choice on such things as the kind of radio they have.' He said that some of the models used in the test did not have radios fitted as standard and were therefore less likely to be broken into.

A Ford Granada 2.0i was the only executive car that the association failed to break into.

Paul Kitchen, senior editor of Which?, the Consumers' Association magazine, said: 'A nice shiny car is a tempting target for thieves - but it is still possible to break into some new models in less than 10 seconds. With car crime running at record levels all manufacturers must stop looking at security devices as added extras and instead provide them as standard equipment.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in