'Secret defence cuts' denied
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MALCOLM RIFKIND, the Secretary of State for Defence, yesterday denied reports that a secret review of Britain's defences was under way in the MoD designed to cut pounds 4bn from the defence budget over the next three years, writes Christopher Bellamy.
He described the claims in yesterday's Sunday Times as 'exaggerated and sensationalist', and said they were untrue.
Many of the components of the report have already been announced or leaked. On Thursday, the Government revealed that naval manpower would drop by 5,000 below the 55,000 target set out in its Options For Change review.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4 yesterday, Mr Rifkind criticised as simplistic those who assumed that the reprieve of the navy's pounds 170m commando carrier (LPH) would have to be paid for out of the naval budget. Defence sources have confirmed that equipment costs for one service can be met by the whole defence budget.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments