Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Scottish review backs suspect's right to silence

John Arlidge,Scotland Correspondent
Friday 28 October 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government's efforts to abolish a suspect's right to silence has received an embarrassing setback after the body set up to advise ministers on changes to the law in Scotland rejected the plan.

In a report published yesterday, the Scottish Law Commission questions ministers' claims that 'professional criminals' are taking advantage of the right to refuse to answer questions put by investigating authorities. It rejects proposals in a Scottish Office consultation paper that jurors should be informed that the accused has chosen to remain silent.

In England and Wales, proposals in the Criminal Justice Bill to abolish a suspect's right to silence have received parliamentary approval. The Bill is due to receive Royal Assent shortly.

Criticism from the Government's advisers north of the border will make it difficult to force through changes in the law there, raising the prospect that people arrested in Scotland will enjoy rights denied to those in England and Wales.

Proposals to bring Scottish law into line with the planned changes in England and Wales were published last month by Ian Lang, the Secretary of State for Scotland.

In a consultation paper Scottish Office ministers expressed concern that 'the right to silence has been taken advantage of by professional criminals and terrorists and that the law as it concerns accused persons who remain silent, no longer strikes the correct balance between the interests of the accused and the need to convict the guilty'. Ministers asked the Law Commission to comment on the proposals.

In a pointed rebuke in yesterday's report, the commission asks: 'Who has expressed concern? Are they fully informed about the Scottish criminal justice system and representative of Scottish public opinion as a whole?'

Commissioners point out that the Scottish Office has failed to say 'how many accused persons, over a stated period, have been wrongly acquitted after exercising the right to silence . . .'

The Commission concludes: 'It is unclear from the consultation paper where the line is to be drawn beyond which a risk to the innocent is justifiable in the public interest . . .'

Ministers do not have to accept the commission's recommendations. A Scottish Office spokesman said last night that the commission's views were 'one of many'. An announcement is expected next month.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in