Michael Gove: Blocking Scottish gender law was ‘wise and proportionate’
The Communities Secretary said the Scottish Government’s plans to reform gender recognition laws had been ‘folly’.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Diminishing support for the Scottish Government’s plan to reform gender recognition laws shows that blocking those changes was “wise and proportionate”, Michael Gove has said.
The Communities Secretary told MPs on Wednesday that the UK Government had blocked the controversial Gender Recognition Reform (GRR) Bill “with regret”, but had been vindicated by subsequent events.
Appearing before the House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Mr Gove said the law was now “pretty friendless”.
He said: “At the time there was a fair degree of pushback, but the collapse of both support for, and the case for, that legislation leads me to believe that this was a wise and proportionate intervention to defend women’s spaces, to defend the Equalities Act, and if it is the case that the victor in the current SNP leadership election, whoever that is, as first minister wants to bring forward this legislation, I would be very surprised.”
Leadership candidates Kate Forbes and Ash Regan have already indicated their opposition to the gender recognition Bill.
Ms Regan resigned as a minister in protest against the legislation. Ms Forbes was on maternity leave during the vote, but has since said she would have voted against the law.
Humza Yousaf is the only SNP leadership candidate who voted for the Bill, and he has pledged to fight the Section 35 order blocking the legislation in court.
Ms Forbes has said she would look to amend the Bill, while Ms Regan said she would put it to a citizens’ assembly if there was a desire to do so.
During Wednesday’s committee hearing, Mr Gove also denied that the use of a Section 35 order represented a breakdown in relations between the UK and Scottish Governments.
He said: “I think it was the case that the Scottish Government, for reasons they must answer for, decided on a course of action that was folly.”
Asked whether the Government would take similar action on the beleaguered deposit return scheme, Mr Gove said there were “no plans” to do so.