Scientists fail to agree on smallpox destruction
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE WORLD'S leading virologists last night failed to come to a clear-cut consensus on whether the last remaining traces of smallpox should be killed off.
About 1,000 virologists attended a conference in Glasgow to discuss a World Health Organisation recommendation that the last traces of the killer disease should be destroyed. The traces are kept deep-frozen at laboratories in Moscow and Atlanta, in the US.
With smallpox long eradicated, the WHO first recommended they be destroyed by the end of this year, but granted a stay of execution for more debate. The final decision will be taken by the World Health Assembly next year.
Speakers in the debate at the International Congress on Virology divided exactly down the middle, five in favour of destruction and five against. Most of those in favour of keeping it argued the frozen remains could yet have much to teach scientists studying the behaviour of other viruses - with possible implications for shedding new light on diseases such as Aids.
But Dr Brian Mahy, of the Atlanta laboratory, said destruction would send a 'clear message' that mankind was 'not afraid to create a safer environment for future generations'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments